AI Governance

 for EdTech 

Innovation alone doesn’t win contracts.
Trust does.

You don’t have to face compliance alone. We’ll help you turn tough questions into clear answers—and stalled deals into signed contracts.

Building the Future of AI in Education”

AI in schools is not just about adopting new technologies; it’s about shaping an ethical, sustainable future for education. We provide the expertise and tools needed to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring that every step toward AI integration is informed, intentional, and aligned with your mission.

District leaders want the benefits of AI, but they won’t move forward without proof that your product is safe, compliant, and responsibly governed. Even the strongest features can stall if you can’t answer the hard questions about data, bias, and oversight.

The Challenge for Providers

AI-enabled EdTech companies face a unique barrier: compliance uncertainty. Districts are asking tougher questions than ever, backed by evolving laws like FERPA, COPPA, GDPR, and state-level rules. Add community concerns over equity and transparency, and the wrong answer can mean lost deals, slower growth, and shaken investor confidence.

How We Help

At AI Governance Group, we partner with product and leadership teams to make governance a competitive advantage. Our approach helps you:

  • Build district-ready compliance answers that clear procurement hurdles.

  • Protect student data and your IP through proven governance frameworks.

  • Document fairness and safety to satisfy boards, parents, and investors.

  • Position your company as a trusted partner—not just another vendor.

The Result

Instead of reacting to compliance pushback late in the sales cycle, you lead with readiness. That shifts the conversation from risk to opportunity, helping your AI tools reach classrooms faster, with trust that sustains renewals and long-term growth.

Partner with Us for Responsible AI in EdTech

From drafting governance frameworks to offering professional development, we are your partner in leveraging AI responsibly. Together, we can ensure that AI in schools enhances learning, empowers educators, and fosters an inclusive, equitable future.

Your Guide to Navigating Compliance in EdTech

From student data privacy to AI oversight, each framework here shapes how schools decide which technologies to trust — explore them to see where your solution stands and what it takes to clear the bar.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Education records (grades, schedules, health info unless HIPAA applies)

    ENFORCED BY: U.S. Dept of Education

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Schools; Vendors via DPA

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Limit disclosure, parental rights

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Sign clear DPAs; restrict access; allow export & correction of records by schools/parents.

    KEY NOTES: Parents/students have rights to inspect & amend.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Children’s info under 13: name, address, email, photos, geolocation

    ENFORCED BY: FTC

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Websites & Apps

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Parental consent

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Obtain verifiable parental consent OR rely on school consent for education-only use; do not use data for ads.

    KEY NOTES: May extend age to 16 in future.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Sensitive survey content (political beliefs, religion, mental health)

    ENFORCED BY: U.S. Dept of Education

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Schools; Vendors collecting survey data

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Consent for sensitive surveys

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Get school approval for any surveys; provide opt-out or consent forms; store data securely.

    KEY NOTES: Parents must consent for certain questions.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Health info (diagnosis, treatment, payment)

    ENFORCED BY: HHS

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Schools w/ direct healthcare; relevant apps

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Applies if FERPA doesn't cover

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Encrypt health data; limit access; clarify if FERPA covers info instead; disclose security measures.

    KEY NOTES: FERPA generally supersedes HIPAA in schools.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Student-created info, test results, medical, criminal records

    ENFORCED BY: CA Attorney General

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Vendors & Operators

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: No profiling, targeted ads

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Do not use data for ads/profiling; encrypt data; provide security measures in privacy policy; comply with requests to delete data.

    KEY NOTES: Applies broadly to EdTech serving CA students.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Filters for harmful content; monitor student online activities

    ENFORCED BY: FCC (via E-rate)

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Schools; Vendors supporting compliance

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Filtering, monitoring

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Provide safe search tools, content filters, admin dashboards for monitoring usage.

    KEY NOTES: E-rate funding tied to compliance

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: PII triggers: name + SSN, license, account info, credentials

    ENFORCED BY: State AGs; federal rules

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Schools & Vendors

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Timely notification

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Encrypt PII; monitor for breaches; have documented incident response plan; notify schools quickly if breached.

    KEY NOTES: States vary; CA includes online account credentials.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: EU data rights: access, correct, erase, data minimization

    ENFORCED BY: EU DPAs

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Vendors processing EU data

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Rights to access, erase

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Allow data export/deletion on request; get explicit consent where needed; keep data in EEA if possible; appoint EU rep if required.

    KEY NOTES: Fines for non-compliance can be steep.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Risk classification for AI systems; transparency; human oversight

    ENFORCED BY: EU Authorities

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Vendors offering AI in EU

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Transparency, bias checks

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Conduct AI risk assessment; provide explainability; human review for high-risk AI tasks (grading, behavior tracking).

    KEY NOTES: Align product roadmap now; coming into force soon.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Bias testing, explainable AI, privacy-enhancing tech

    ENFORCED BY: Various federal agencies

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Vendors using AI with districts

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Explainability, bias, risk control

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Implement fairness testing; maintain clear documentation of AI systems; train teams on explainability; share governance plan with districts.

    KEY NOTES: Not yet a law but guides procurement requirements.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Defines standardized cybersecurity job roles and competencies.

    ENFORCED BY: U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Schools, vendors, and training providers

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Job roles & skills

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Use NICE role definitions to train staff and define security responsibilities in your team.

    KEY NOTES: Useful for building security maturity in EdTech teams.

  • KEY PROTECTIONS: Provides a framework to identify, protect, detect, respond to, and recover from cybersecurity threats.

    ENFORCED BY: U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

    WHO MUST COMPLY: Vendors and schools implementing cybersecurity best practices

    KEY REQUIREMENTS: Protect, detect, respond

    HOW EDTECH SOFTWARE COMPLIES: Use NIST CSF or NIST 800-53 to define internal security controls, audit readiness, and recovery plans.

    KEY NOTES: Often referenced in RFPs and federal guidance on secure systems.

AI for Education Articles: Informative + Guiding Insights for AI Governance